“Why do you think some atrocities reverberate through the annals of history, compelling people to vow ‘never again’ and yet, others are completely lost to the sands of time?”
“Well, I believe that there is a politics of memory and forgetting. Through social climates, economic issues and sheer demographics, what lies within a culture’s memory is always being molded.”
A few days I reached out to a wonderful journalist/scholar who has spent his life studying the politics of foreign policy and wrote a book about King Leopold II and his legacy in Congo: Mr. Adam Hochschild. I was curious about atrocities that seem to become lost in the microseconds of an ever-unfolding human narrative, and we came to discuss the politics of memory. ‘
As societies shift, those who wield the most influence in the social structure will decide the direction of collective memory. Even nations that pride themselves on freedom of speech and ideas are not immune to this phenomenon. Adam went on to recount the early days of his career. He told me that if you went to Williamsburg in the 1970s there would be scant mention, if any, of the legacy of servitude there. But it was the ripple effect of the civil rights movement and the shifting American population that the story gets told. Stories only get told because their purveyors advocate for them.
There is no discipline that can escape the spirit of the ties. I think about this incredible book that I’ve been reading lately — Heart: A History. It’s powerful and moving. Within it is a story about the Roman doctor, Galen. Galen was the most renowned doctor in Rome and perhaps the most renowned medical practitioner in ancient times. But his theories on the heart and how it functioned within the body were dubious, at best – dangerous at worst. Yet to challenge Galen was to blaspheme. And so cardiologists throughout the ages were harangued – and even hanged – for trying to present alternative (and correct) theories of cardiac function. It wasn’t until the 19th Century that a pair of doctors in England eschewed their fear for social persecution in order to forward accurate science.
And among their influences was an incredible Persian doctor, Ibn Al-Nafis, who in 1242 made so accurate a theory of the heart that it still stands up to 21st century scrutiny. But his theory went lost and unacknowledged by cardiologists for 700 years, leaving matters of the heart in the west to be “more deeply hidden than the step of the black ant on black rock in the black of night.” These are the politics of memory. And forgetting. Sometimes it can hold humanity back for centuries. Even Millenia.
Storytelling is a deeply human phenomenon. Stories are the substance that bind the collective. But in this day and age, with billions of people living out billions of narratives, how do we find balance in what stories come to the fore? Even some of the greatest minds in history have been subject to the politics of collective forgetting.
I’m not sure there is a good answer to this question. Cultural forgetting can happen the other way as well. As many continue to diversify, the pendulum of forgetting can swing the other way. I’m not sure what that will mean, because the balance of power can shut out a whole different village of narratives. Perhaps that is the source of the nationalist, protectionist and isolationist backlash that we are seeing today: people fearing in the caverns of their beings that their cultural mythos, their essence, will be forgotten.
But perhaps the shift starts with access. Perhaps it begins with the opportunity to be exposed to divergent narratives and to choose for oneself which you want to delve deeper into.
In this time of blending cultures, there is hope for a the new light that will shine on narratives both painful and providential – so that we may not forget those who shook the world, and so that we may all stand on an entire Earth of collective wisdom.